eHealth Adoption
eHealth Adoption
Create a PowerPoint presentation that reviews four peer-reviewed articles written in the last five years on the issues around the adoption of eHealth in the Kingdom. Your presentation should contain the following concepts. Discuss at least 4 of the following perceptions that physicians may have that could be causing them to hesitate in using this technology.
Usefulness
Technical support available
Increased workload
User-friendly technology
Staff attitudes
Cost
Patient privacy
requirements:
Be 10 slides in length, not including the title or reference slides.
Be formatted according to APA writing guidelines.
Provide citations from six scholarly articles.
These citations should be listed in the Notes section of the slide in which they appear.
Each slide must provide detailed speaker’s notes to support the slide content. These should be a minimum of 100 words long (per slide) and must be a part of the presentation.
Notes must draw from and cite relevant reference materials.
Utilize the following headings to organize the content in your presentation:
Introduction
4 of the above topics as 4 slides
Cultural, Social, or Religious Barriers
Recommendations for KSA
Conclusion
SEU HCM570 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 6
Exceeds Expectation Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence Content, Research, and Analysis 21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points Requirements Exceeds Expectation
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on eHealth Adoption completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
-Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
Meets Expectation – Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
Below Expectation – Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
Limited Evidence – Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points Content Exceeds Expectation
– Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions.
Meets Expectation – Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions.
Below Expectation – Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions.
Limited Evidence – Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions.
25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points Analysis Exceeds Expectation
– Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.
Meets Expectation – Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.
Below Expectation – Provides poor thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.
Limited Evidence – Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.
13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points Sources Exceeds Expectation
– Sources go above and beyond required criteria, and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
Meets Expectation – Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
Below Expectation – Sources meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
Limited Evidence – Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
Mechanics and Writing 9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 1-4 Points Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
Exceeds Expectation – Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and
Meets Expectation – Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment.
Below Expectation – Project is poorly organized and written, and may not follow proper format as outlined in the assignment.
Limited Evidence – Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Poor quality work;
SEU HCM570 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 6
paragraph structure; contains no errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.
Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; may include a few minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.
Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development, and/or includes numerous or major errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.
unacceptable in terms of grammar, spelling, APA style, and APA citations and references.
Total points possible = 105
