Assessment 3: Financial Engineering to enhance shareholder value
An 8-10 slide presentation to your staff describing your analysis, linking what tools you utilized and why you chose those tools. You will use data to support your evidence-base financial decisions. You will also explain your recommendations to maximize stakeholder value, translating those to tactical outcomes to be implemented by your staff.
Introduction
This assessment builds on your prior work in Assessments 1 and 2. It is a presentation to your staff describing you analysis, linking what tools you utilized and why you chose those tools. You will use data to support your evidence-base financial decisions. You will also explain your recommendations to maximize stakeholder value, translating those to tactical outcomes to be implemented by your staff.
- Apply the theories, models, and practices of finance to the financial management of an organization.
- Analyze financing strategies to maximize stakeholder value.
- Apply financial analyses to business planning and decision making.
- Use data to support evidence-based financial decisions.
Scenario
The senior leadership has approved your recommendations to move forward. You are now tasked with operationalizing your recommendations. Meeting with your staff, you will translate recommendations to strategies and corresponding tactical objectives. You will explain how you used financial analysis to develop these recommendations, discussing the financial tools you will use to monitor implementation progress.
Your Role
You are one of the high-performing financial analyst managers at ABC Healthcare Corporation and are under consideration for a promotion to Director of Operations.
Requirements
Follow these steps to complete this presentation:
- You are presenting to your staff a summary of the reports presented to senior leadership (Assessments 1 and 2).
- Start by presenting the overall current financial condition of the company as presented to senior leadership (one to two slides).
- Provide an overview of your analysis, linking what tools (financial statements, ratios, industry trends, capital structure) you utilized and why you chose these tools (two slides).
- Link the data used to support your evidence-based financial decisions, providing justification for the recommendations (two slides).
- State the recommendations focused on maximizing stakeholder value into strategies newly adopted by the company, i.e., expansion to a new geographical market, the development of a new dividend policy, changes in capital expenditures, reduction of workforce (one slide).
- Translate those strategies to tactical objectives to be implemented by your staff, noting evidenced-based academic citations (one to two slides).
- Discuss what financial tools you will use to monitor the progress of these tactics (one slide).
Deliverable Format
- Be sure to use a bullet format in your slides but also include detailed narrative supported by relevant literature citations in the notes section.
- Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message and quality.
- Use at least three scholarly resources.
- Length: 8-10 content slides in addition to title and reference slides.
- Use 12 point, Times New Roman.
Evaluation
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies through corresponding scoring guide criteria:
- Competency 1: Apply the theories, models, and practices of finance to the financial management of an organization.
- Demonstrate an understanding of key financial tools (financial statements, ratios, industry trends, capital structure, competitive analysis) by providing an overview of the analysis used supporting recommendations made in Assessments 1 and 2. Provide a rationale for why tools were utilized.
- Competency 2: Analyze financing strategies to maximize stakeholder value.
- Link the data used to support evidence-based recommendations, translating the recommendations to strategies focused on maximizing stakeholder value.
- Competency 3: Apply financial analyses to business planning and decision making.
- Translate strategies to tactical objectives to be implemented by staff, noting evidenced-based academic citations.
- Competency 4: Use data to support evidence-based financial decisions.
- Evaluate and recommend financial tools to be used to monitor the progress of these tactics.
Your course instructor will use the scoring guide to review your deliverable as if they were your CEO. Review the scoring guide prior to developing and submitting your assessment.
Resources
Risk Management
• Buffett, W. (1984, May 17). The superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville. https://www8.gsb.columbia.edu/ articles/columbia-business/superinvestors
• Sumflows. (2013). Warren Buffett: Diversification [Video] | Transcript https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbjPiYE- F4Y
• How Warren Buffett thinks about risk [Blog post]. (2016, March 9). Newstex Global Business Blogs.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., Jaffe, J. F., & Jordan, B. D. (2021). Corporate finance: Core principles and applications (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill. Available in the courseroom via the VitalSource Bookshelf link.
• The following chapters advance the concept of risk by relating it to return. The concepts of risk and return are directly correlated. They affect investment and capital project selection and are incorporated in corporation and investment value. ▪ Chapters 10, "Risk and Return: Lessons from
Market History," pages 287-315. ▪ Chapters 11, "Return and Risk: The Capital
Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)," pages 316-356. • Simon, B. (2013). Finance lecture – risk, return and
CAPM [Video] | Transcript https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=3BIIiUyr3-w
• View the segment 1:01:00-1:16:00.
• Klontz, B. T., & Horwitz, E. J. (2017). Behavioral finance 2.0: Financial psychology. Journal of Financial Planning, 30(5), 28-29.
• This article describes how behavioral finance is the
application of cognitive psychology to finance. • Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., Jaffe, J. F., & Jordan, B.
D. (2021). Corporate finance: Core principles and applications (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill. Available in the courseroom via the VitalSource Bookshelf link.
• Chapter 13, "Efficient Capital Markets and Behavioral Challenges," pages 390-422. This chapter contrasts two of the primary theories of investing: the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) and the behavioral finance view. They are primarily mutually exclusive concepts and color investors' views of how much they can impact investment returns.
• YaleCourses. (2012). Behavioral finance and the role of psychology [Video] | Transcript https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=chSHqogx2CI
Finance costs • Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., Jaffe, J. F., & Jordan, B.
D. (2021). Corporate finance: Core principles and applications (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill. Available in the courseroom via the VitalSource Bookshelf link.
• Chapter 12, "Risk, Cost of Capital, and Valuation," pages 357-389. This chapter deals with one of the most well known financial concepts: the cost of capital, or how to figure the threshold rate for investment projects.
• Edspira. (n.d.). Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) [Video] | Transcript https://youtu.be/ 46oLXwClvkw
• Beers, B. (2018, February 9). How is debt "a relatively cheaper form of finance than equity"? https://
www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/05/ debtcheaperthanequity.asp
WACC • Pysh, P. (2012). What is financial risk [Video] |
Transcript https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=-4mXnFK0ecM
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., Jaffe, J. F., & Jordan, B. D. (2021). Corporate finance: Core principles and applications (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill. Available in the courseroom via the VitalSource Bookshelf link.
• These two chapters deal with the capital structure of a firm, that is, how a firm will finance itself, via debt or equity. An examination of the features, benefits, and negatives of financing through both financing types will be discussed in these chapters. ▪ Chapter 14, "Capital Structure: Basic
Concepts," pages 423-450. ▪ Chapter 15, "Capital Structure: Limits to the
Use of Debt," pages 451-479. • Understanding Finance. (2014). James Tompkins: The
capital structure decision and taxes [Video] | Transcript https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=HeWcPUk8rGw
• View the first 15 minutes of the video.
,
Evaluation Of Capital Projects
MBAFPX5014: Applied Managerial Finance
1 April 2022
Executive Summary
Capital budgeting refers to a process a firm undertakes to evaluate potential investments that add
value to the firm. The potential projects should as well enhance shareholders' value. A firm will
be required to assess the cash inflows and the cash outflows of a particular task within its
economic lifetime. The company determines whether the returns from the potential project have
met the target benchmark. A project is approved if it has completed the target benchmark. If a
project doesn't encounter the standard mark, it is rejected. If several assignments are considered,
the project that yields the best returns is preferred over the rest. ABC healthcare company is
considering three projects that have been proposed to increase shareholder value. This report
entails the ABC healthcare background and the capital budgeting used to evaluate and scrutinize
each of the three projects to recommend the project with the highest shareholder value.
Introduction
ABC healthcare is a giant firm in the medical industry. The company was established in 1995.
They initially opened a clinic in the same year at phoenix. By 2005, ABC healthcare had thirteen
surgical centers and eleven additional outpatient clinics. ABC health has acquired several firms
since it was founded. It has expanded into a full hospital operating twenty-four hours. Currently,
it has more than one hundred operational medical facilities.
Evaluating ABC healthcare's fiscal state is necessary to maximize shareholder value as the firm
ensures its expansion and growth. After the previous analysis of ABC healthcare's performance,
it was realized that shareholder value wasn't maximized. Analysts had previously evaluated the
healthcare performance and realized that shareholders' value maximization was not met. Hence,
they had to propose other projects to determine whether the value could be completed. Since its
mission is to be among the top leaders, it has to ensure a robust financial base. On behalf of ABC
company, Maria has requested three potential projects to be evaluated using capital budgeting
techniques and finally presented before the leadership team. The leadership team will develop a
viable decision on which project to choose upon evaluation.
The three anticipated projects A, B, and C. Project A entails significant equipment purchases.
Project B involves expansion into three additional states. The third project that is projected C
encompasses marketing and advertising campaign. Therefore, the manager ought to predict each
project's cash flows by using capital budgeting techniques to consider which offers the best
shareholders value. There are Four capital budgeting appraisal methods that will be used to attain
this goal. The four methods include profitability index, present net worth, payback period, and
internal rate of return. After evaluating these techniques, the manager will give out suitable
recommendations.
Capital Budgeting appraisal tools
The capital appraisal tools or methods aid a firm in the determination of which project to
undertake among several projects. The strategies help decide which project to accept and which
to reject. A project with the best-expected returns is chosen over the others. ABC healthcare will
decide which project will have the best shareholders' value by using the methods. This discussion
will discuss the four primary appraisal methods: NPV, payback period, PI, and internal rate of
return.
Net present value (NPV)
The net present value method is ranked among the topmost capital budgeting techniques. It is
attained by deducting the PV of cash outflows from the cash inflows. Since the calculations of
this method are complex, the ABC company will be compelled to use an excel spreadsheet in
calculating the NPV of each project (Mayes, (n.d.). A project with a positive net present value is
chosen, while a negative NPV is rejected. The highest positive net current worth is selected if
several projects are being appraised. In our case, we will outweigh the three projects and choose
the best among the three since all the projects possess a positive NPV. The net present value
determines whether a project's projected return offsets an average interest rate on the preliminary
venture. As a result, investors would not risk investing in a project that yields no return.
However, this method may not be sufficient in determining which project will deliver the highest
shareholders' value.
the formula of the Net Present value is as follows:
NPV = Cash flow / (1 + i) ^t – initial investment
where: i is the discount rate
t is the period
Internal rate of return
The internal rate of return abbreviated IRR is a well-thought-out one of the most excellent
imperative substitute capital budgeting appraisal techniques for the NPV. The internal rate of
return is a discount rate that returns the net present value of the entire cash flow to null. For
instance, the highest IRR of the three projects is accepted for ABC healthcare. Performing the
computations of the internal rate of return by hand is challenging; the ABC healthcare crew is
compelled to use an excel spreadsheet to carry out these computations. The justification behind
the IRR method is that it ensures a solitary numeral that recapitulates the project's virtues. Once a
discount rate is set, the IRR can be accomplished; whatever is approximately the given discount
rate must be accepted, whatever below the discount rate ought to be vetoed. The allocated
discount rate will be consequent while carrying out the NPV.
IRR is calculated using the formula below.
Profitability index (PI)
The profitability index is arrived at by subtracting the initial cost from its present value. The pi
designates an index that epitomizes the association between the expenses and paybacks of an anticipated
project. The profitability index aims at showing the attractiveness of a project. Any investment with
profitability higher than one is considered good; hence undertaking while investment with a negative
profitability index or less than one should be rejected given several proposed projects to be conducted; the
project with the highest profitability index is chosen since it is the most attractive.
The profitability index is calculated using the formula:
Profitability Index = (Net Present Value + Initial Investment) / Initial Investment
Payback period
The payback period is a capital appraisal technique that determines the period taken for a firm or
individual to recuperate the initial cost of an investment. This method is calculated by dividing
the initial cost of investment by the yearly anticipated cash flow. A project with a shorter
payback period is considered to be good. Of the three projects proposed by ABC healthcare, the
one with the shortest payback period will be regarded (Ross et al., 2018). The payback period
technique doesn’t contemplate the time value of money, unlike the NPV and the internal rate of
return techniques. The method is commonly used as it is the simplest to calculate. It supplements
a supplement appraisal technique to other appraisal techniques.
when calculating the payback period, we use the formula:
Payback Period = Investment / Cash Flow Per Unit
Project a: major equipment purchase
The following are the project results on purchasing significant equipment after evaluation using
different capital budgeting techniques.
The first project to be evaluated is the purchase of major equipment. The anticipated cost of
acquiring this new major equipment is equivalent to $10 million with the intent of projecting the
abridged price of sales by five per annum for the subsequent eight years. The salvage value is
estimated to be $500,000. The required rate of return on this project must be greater than 8%.
The depreciation method used in this equipment machine is the modified accelerated cost
recovery system depreciation rate for the recovery period technique (Shelton, 2017, Feb 19). The
Payback period 1.36
Net present value 44,262,269
Profitability index 5.43
Internal rate of return 79.79%
schedule used must be a 7-year schedule. Yearly sales for the first year are expected to be $20
million and should stay constant year over year for the eight years. Preceding this project, ABC
healthcare is presently operating at the cost of sales at 60%, with a marginal corporate tax rate of
25%.
From the above table, the payback period of this project is 1.36. The net present value is
$44,262,269. The profitability index and the internal rate of return are anticipated to be 5.43 and
79.79%, respectively. The project is attractive since its profitability index is above one.
Project b: expansion into three additional states
The second ABC healthcare project to be undertaken is expansion into three different states. The
results after the evaluation are as per the table below.
The initial investment in the expansion project is $7 million—networking capital of one
million dollars to be recouped at the end of five years.
As per the table above, the project has a positive net present value of $22,259,712. It has
an attractive profitability index of 3.78. The IRR has surpassed the required rate of return of
12%. It has the shortest payback period of 1.14.
Project c: marketing/advertising campaign
Payback period 1.14
Net present value 22,259,712
Profitability index 3.78
Internal rate of return 91.48%
Payback period 1.23
Net present value 33,470,903
The marketing and advertising campaign project has a positive net present value of
$33,470,903. It has an attractive profitability index of 4.84. The internal rate of return of this
project is 90.36%. The payback period is 1.23.
Recommendations
After the evaluation of the three proposed projects, it can be construed that the senior

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Assessment 3: Financial Engineering to enhance shareholder value completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
manager should consider choosing the best project to increase shareholders' equity. Of the three
projects, major equipment purchase is the most attractive project compared to the other two
projects. It is the strongest with the highest profitability index and net present value. Therefore,
having high profitability index, investors will be attracted to undertaking a particular project.
Profitability index 4.84
Internal rate of return 90.36%
References
Mayes, T. R. (n.d.). Microsoft Excel as a financial calculator part I. http:// www.tvmcalcs.com/
index.php/calculators/excel_tvm_functions/ excel_tvm_functions_page
Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., Jaffe, J. F., & Jordan, B. D. (2018). Corporate finance: Core
principles and applications (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Shelton, C. (2017, Feb 19). MACRS Depreciation Tables & How to Calculate. Retrieved from
Fit Small Business: https://fitsmallbusiness.com/macrs-depreciation-calculator/
,
Running Head: FINANCE 1
Finance
Student Name
Tutor’s Name
Date
FINANCE 2
Executive Summary
ABC has been in operation for more than years and has been driving the way in home
clinical gear. Founded by Maria Gomez more than thirty years ago she also acts as the company's
president, the organization possesses emergency clinics, surgical centers, emergency care centers
as well as outpatient clinics. I'm one of the best financial experts within the organization and
Maria has requested my expertise in assessing different monetary records and came up with
suggestions to boost investor value.
Company Background
ABC has been in existence since 1983, they have been leading in supplying home clinical
equipment. At first, founded by Elwood Miller as a home oxygen provider, ABC has grown to
transform into Virginia's biggest independent provider of home clinical and respiratory products.
We assist countless patients with getting the equipment they need and the administration they
merit.
What isolates us from other providers is our commitment to industry-driving client care,
positive patient outcomes, and collaboration. Our accomplishment is a result of fulfilling these
expectations and making every contribution to inpatients and clinical consideration providers
significant. We accomplish it through our accentuation on people, cycle as well development.
Our most significant resource is our kin.
At ABC, our employees are highly skilled, caring and to be more specific partners.
Everyone knows how critical our patients' lives are. Thusly, our staff prod each other, assist one
FINANCE 3
another, work as a team as well as contribute in forums. We join top tier programming, industry-
driving gear, and top tier clinical tools to control our business. Our establishment gives our team
the tools they should be successful in their work and to help care for our patients.
Overall Financial Analysis
A financial analysis will be performed by the management team at ABC Healthcare. This
assessment will be done to review the financial outlines and extents to find the organization's real
condition and value. A broad overview of the financial extent assessment will be driven and will
detail how liquidity, longer-term dissolvability, assess management and efficiency influence the
affiliation. The characteristics and inadequacy of ABC will be separated. Included within this
review will be an examination similar to design which will show the course of the affiliation. At
last, a Competitive Comparative examination will be done to show the association's current spot
in the market appeared differently in relation to their companions and rivals by separating in
everyday organization operation.
Short-term solvency or liquidity ratios center on an association's capacity to pay it,
lender, over a brief period easily (Brigham & Ehrhardt, 2017). The assessment technique decides
a company's book and market esteem. The current extent contemplates all assets and Quick
Ratio, if not called an assessment, simply use assets that can be changed into cash within a span
of 90 days.
ABC’s current ratios increased from 2017 to 2019 such increase generally indicates that a
company is able to meet its short-term obligations. Extensions in the current proportion after
some time might suggest an organization is growing into its capacity while a decreasing
FINANCE 4
proportion might exhibit the reverse. The business average over a comparable period showed a
more essential ability to bring in cash. In connection, the smart proportion moreover extended
now in 2018.
Trend Analysis
Assets Turnover
The asset turnover ratio is a productivity proportion that quantifies an organization's
capacity to create deals from its resources by contrasting net deals and normal complete
resources (Bradbury & Coulton, 2020). Toward the day's end, this extent shows how capably an
organization can use its assets to make bargains. This analysis is centered on inventory turnover
ratio which measure how frequently a stock is sold during a specific period.
Profitability
The benefits of ROA evaluate how effectively an organization can manage its assets to be
productive during that period. The net income proportion shows what level of deals are left over
after all expenses are paid by the business. ABC healthcare ROA ratio declined from 2017-2018
yet it increased from 2018 to 2019. The profit margin showed similar results a decline from
2017-2018 then increase 2018-2019.
Market Value
FINANCE 5
The value pay proportion shows that the market is glad to pay for a stock based on its
current profit. The event's income proportion extent, on occasion called the interest inclusion
proportion, is an incorporation proportion that checks the proportionate proportion of pay that
can be used to cover interest costs later on. The PE proportion is a clear technique to overview
whether a stock is done or misjudged and is the most comprehensively used valuation measure.
Competitive Comparative Analysis
Financial Statement Analysis
There are several money-related details that explain ABC healthcare financial sensibility
from 2017 to 2019. To be specific, the record will focus on an Income Statement, Balance Sheet,
and Statement of Cash Flows. ABC healthcare yearly pay for 2018 was $167.94B, a 9.66%
increase from 2017. The working pay for 2019 was $1.112B a $22.98% decay from 2018.
Working pay for 2018 was $1.444B, a 36.15% expansion from 2017. Net gain for 2019 was
$0.855B, a 48.42% decrease from 2018. The total compensation for 2018 was $1.658B, a 355%
expansion from 2017.
ABC healthcare bookkeeping report changes in assets and liabilities that you see on the
financial record are similarly reflected in the wages and costs that you see on the compensation
articulation, which achieves the organization's advantages or setbacks. ABC total assets for 2019
were $39.172B, a 3.99% addition from 2018. The outright assets for 2019 were $39.172B, a
3.99% increase from 2018. Outright assets for 2018 were $37.67B, a 6.66% increase from 2017.
The investor value for 2019 was $2.993B, a 1.86% decrease from 2018. Investor value for 2018
was $3.05B, a 47.74% expansion from 2017.
FINANCE 6
ABC healthcare's pay clarification gives more information about cash assets recorded on
a bookkeeping report and are linked, but not the same, to add up to pay showed up on the
compensation decree. And so forth. ABC medical services' yearly total compensation/misfortune
appeared on the pay proclamation for 2018 was $1.616B, a 343.34% expansion from 2017.net
pay/misfortune for 2019 was $0.854B, a 47.14% decay from 2018.
Recommendations
Moreover, receivable turnover proportion centers on how regularly a business can change
its records receivable into cash during a period. ABC healthcare inventory turnover ratio declined
from 2017-2018 yet it increased from 2018 to 2019. Receivable turnover ratio declined from
2017-2019. Considering ABC healthcare product supply, it suggests generating income to turn
over stock and receivables is the typical, most ideal situation.
Conclusion
ABC Healthcare and the business was reasonably tantamount significance both could
change over more assets will be effectively changed over into money. A commitment to value
proportion lower than one displays a significantly more financially stable business. At the same
time, ABC medical services revenue acquired proportion was 0.008. Their invested ratio
expanded each announced year. ABC healthcare's long dissolvability is critical.
FINANCE 7
Reference
Block, S. B., Hirt, G. A., Short, J. D., & Danielsen, B. R. (2018). Foundations of financial
management.
Brigham & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2017). Financial management: Theory & practice.
Gitman, L. J., Juchau, R., & Flanagan, J. (2017). Principles of managerial finance. Pearson
Higher Education AU.
FINANCE 8
Wright, S., Bradbury, M., & Coulton, J. (2020). Business analysis and valuation: Using financial
statements. Cengage AU.

